<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Power on The IT Hollow</title>
    <link>https://theithollow.com/tags/power/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Power on The IT Hollow</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 13:58:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://theithollow.com/tags/power/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>VMware DPM Green Datacenters</title>
      <link>https://theithollow.com/2012/07/31/vmware-dpm-green-datacenters/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 13:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://theithollow.com/2012/07/31/vmware-dpm-green-datacenters/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Now that we&amp;rsquo;ve entered the virtualization age, we&amp;rsquo;ve become accustomed to moving workloads between hosts in order to get better performance.  We&amp;rsquo;re so used to it, that VMware DRS will move workloads around automatically and many administrators don&amp;rsquo;t even care what host is running their virtual machines.  Hosts are now more like a resource container, where we move our servers to the resource that is most available.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;VMware lets us take DRS one step further, where if we have extra resources available that aren&amp;rsquo;t being used, we can power off the hosts in order to save on power consumption.  If we have 50 hosts running, but only using the resources of 30 of them, let&amp;rsquo;s power off the remaining 20 hosts to save on power and cooling.  Over a year, these types of savings can really add up.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
